<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>USA China Law Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usachinalaw.com/ch_blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usachinalaw.com/ch_blog</link>
	<description>WordPress site for USA China Law Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>?????????</title>
		<link>http://www.usachinalaw.com/ch_blog/%e4%bd%9c%e7%94%9f%e6%84%8f%e4%b8%8d%e4%b8%80%e5%ae%9a%e8%a6%81%e5%90%83%e4%ba%8f/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usachinalaw.com/ch_blog/%e4%bd%9c%e7%94%9f%e6%84%8f%e4%b8%8d%e4%b8%80%e5%ae%9a%e8%a6%81%e5%90%83%e4%ba%8f/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usachinalaw.com/ch_blog/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[??????????? ????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--By Edythe Huang and Robert J. Allan--><br />
??????????? ?????</p>
<p><!--Our clients are giving us dj vu. It's better than many ailments, but the eerie feeling is just as disconcerting, especially when the root cause is known. As we sit in on client interview after client interview in which they tell us their story, we can't help but let that peculiar sensation wash over us. . . the sensation that we've heard this all before.--><br />
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????<br />
<!--Typically, the story goes something like this:--><br />
??????????:<br />
<!--There's a Chinese seller and an American buyer who have cultivated a relationship over a couple of years. According to the contract they have been following for the last year or two, the Chinese seller is to deliver goods in installments over a period of time. The American buyer has always paid on time, and the relationship is a good one.--><br />
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????<br />
<!--Suddenly, upon receiving one of the installments, the American buyer calls up the Chinese seller and sternly says, "the goods weren't conforming this time and I'm not paying for them." The Chinese seller is puzzled, but writes it off as a singular incident and sends the buyer the next installment of goods on time.--><br />
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????<br />
<!--This time, the American buyer accepts the goods and pays on time. The Chinese seller is reassured and sends off the next installment of goods on time.--><br />
???????????????????????????????<br />
<!--The American buyer finds something wrong with this third installment and refuses to pay. Once again, the Chinese seller believes that there must be something wrong with the shipment. After all, he and the American buyer have a long standing relationship. Next time, he tells himself, everything will be fine and he'll get paid. . . just like last time.--><br />
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????<br />
<!--He sends a fourth shipment. Again, the American buyer finds something wrong with the shipment and refuses to pay.--><br />
????????????????????????<br />
<!--If he's smart and on top of things, the Chinese seller realizes that the long term relationship that he spent years cultivating with the American buyer may not be as strong as he thought it was. He calculates that he has sent three installments and is owed a few tens of thousands of dollars, yet knows he is not going to get paid. Many buyers do not realize that they are not going to be paid until a few more installments of goods have gone out and they are out a few hundreds of thousands of dollars.--><br />
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????<br />
<!--Panic sets in. What can he do about it? Many decide that all they can do is chi ku, or eat the bitter. The accounts receivable gets moved to a loss, a very painful loss.--><br />
?????????????????????????????????????<br />
<!--But there are a few brave souls who have ventured into the American justice system. Those are the ones who are giving me dj vu. They are approaching American lawyers to help them collect. And we're able to collect, but it takes the Chinese seller to, first, be able to recognize the problem, and second, get in touch with an attorney who can collect.--><br />
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????<br />
<!--If you and your business dont have to chi ku, then why would you?--><br />
????????????????????????????????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usachinalaw.com/ch_blog/%e4%bd%9c%e7%94%9f%e6%84%8f%e4%b8%8d%e4%b8%80%e5%ae%9a%e8%a6%81%e5%90%83%e4%ba%8f/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>???????????????</title>
		<link>http://www.usachinalaw.com/ch_blog/%e4%b8%80%e4%b8%aa%e5%8f%88%e5%bf%ab%e5%8f%88%e8%83%bd%e6%88%90%e5%8a%9f%e7%9a%84%e6%94%b6%e5%80%ba%e9%ad%94%e6%9c%af%e5%b7%a5%e5%85%b7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usachinalaw.com/ch_blog/%e4%b8%80%e4%b8%aa%e5%8f%88%e5%bf%ab%e5%8f%88%e8%83%bd%e6%88%90%e5%8a%9f%e7%9a%84%e6%94%b6%e5%80%ba%e9%ad%94%e6%9c%af%e5%b7%a5%e5%85%b7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 21:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usachinalaw.com/ch_blog/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[????? ?????, ????? ???9?25???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????(??????????)??????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????? ?????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????$500??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????: ?????????????????????? ????? ?: ?????????????????????????????????????????????]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-by Robert J. Allan and Edythe Huang--><br />
????? ?????, ?????</p>
<p><!--In our blog on September 25, Don't Chi Ku If You Don't Have To, we discussed the reoccurrence of Chinese sellers unable to collect accounts receivable from American buyers based on excuses of timeliness or non-conforming goods. In our story there is usually an American businessperson or entity taking advantage of the poor Chinese seller because of the sellers cultural inclinations. The American buyer knows the Chinese seller is unfamiliar with the United States legal system and is culturally resistant to seeking the advice of legal counsel (although this is changing). The American buyer takes advantage of the Chinese seller by accepting goods but never paying on the premise the Chinese seller will not do anything about it.--></p>
<p>???9?25???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????(??????????)???????????????????????????????</p>
<p><!--We have already suggested seeking the advice of legal counsel; but there's more.--></p>
<p>?????????????????????????</p>
<p><!--What can Counsel for the Chinese seller of goods do about the American buyers failure to pay for the goods?--></p>
<p>??????????????????????</p>
<p><!--The most powerful tool in our collections arsenal is the Prejudgment Writ of Attachment. In our experience, once a Right to Attach Order has been issued based on a Prejudgment Writ of Attachment, the debtor always wants to settle and is willing, if able, to pay at least a substantial portion of the outstanding debt.--></p>
<p>????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????</p>
<p><!--In California, where Allan Law Group, our United States founding member is based, a Prejudgment Writ of Attachment allows commercial creditors with debts owed greater than US$500 to create commercial liens on the debtors' property before a Court issues a judgment. Typically, a Prejudgment Writ of Attachment is proper when the defendant may attempt to hide assets from the Court to prevent a debtor from transferring, encumbering, dissipating, or concealing assets available to satisfy the judgment. In order to obtain a Prejudgment Writ of Attachment, there must be an express or implied contract and a fixed or readily ascertainable amount which the creditor can and must show with "probable validity" the corporate debtor owes the creditor.--></p>
<p>???????????????????????$500???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????</p>
<p><!--Ascertaining with certainty the amount owing is the most important fact and the most time consuming feature of the process. Although the statute seems somewhat vague when referring to a "fixed or readily ascertainable" amount it is not. The Court will only issue a Prejudgment Writ of Attachment if the amount claimed to be owing can be ascertained with certainty. Being off by a penny can prevent the Right to Attach Order from being issued. Remember, the Court is placing a lien on another "person's" property based on a claim, not a judgment and will not do so unless it is established to the Courts satisfaction that a sum certain is probably due to the creditor by the debtor.--></p>
<p>???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????</p>
<p><!--In order to obtain a Right to Attach Order, the creditor must first file a complaint, which is served by the usual means, on the debtor. Notice of the hearing on the Application for the Pre-judgment Writ of Attachment must be served with supporting declarations and supporting documents. At the hearing on the Application the creditor has the burden of proving the creditors right to attach general or specific property, that the creditor will likely prevail in the action with probable validity, and that the attachment is not sought for any other purpose but to secure the claim.--></p>
<p>???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????</p>
<p><!--Before the Court orders a Right to Attach, the creditor must file a Bond or Undertaking, typically through an admitted surety insurer. This is done to protect the debtor in case the creditor does not win the suit.--></p>
<p>?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????</p>
<p><!--The Court will issue a Right to Attach Order if the creditor has met its burden of proof. Once issued by the clerk of the Court, the order will allow the County Sheriffs or the United States Marshals Service to seize property of the debtor which is located in the jurisdiction of the Court. The property will be held until the trial is completed.--></p>
<p>???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????</p>
<p><!--The Problem -- Most businesses cannot wait a year or longer to collect accounts receivable and survive.--></p>
<p>??????: ??????????????????????</p>
<p><!--The Solution -- Once a Right to Attach is ordered by the Court, the creditor's attorney should expect a call from the debtor's attorney. It is now time to settle.--></p>
<p>????? ?: ?????????????????????????????????????????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usachinalaw.com/ch_blog/%e4%b8%80%e4%b8%aa%e5%8f%88%e5%bf%ab%e5%8f%88%e8%83%bd%e6%88%90%e5%8a%9f%e7%9a%84%e6%94%b6%e5%80%ba%e9%ad%94%e6%9c%af%e5%b7%a5%e5%85%b7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>罗博德.艾伦在第二届中外跨国CEO圆桌会议上演讲</title>
		<link>http://www.usachinalaw.com/ch_blog/%e7%bd%97%e5%8d%9a%e5%be%b7%e8%89%be%e4%bc%a6%e5%9c%a8%e7%ac%ac%e4%ba%8c%e5%b1%8a%e4%b8%ad%e5%a4%96%e8%b7%a8%e5%9b%bdceo%e5%9c%86%e6%a1%8c%e4%bc%9a%e8%ae%ae%e4%b8%8a%e6%bc%94%e8%ae%b2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.usachinalaw.com/ch_blog/%e7%bd%97%e5%8d%9a%e5%be%b7%e8%89%be%e4%bc%a6%e5%9c%a8%e7%ac%ac%e4%ba%8c%e5%b1%8a%e4%b8%ad%e5%a4%96%e8%b7%a8%e5%9b%bdceo%e5%9c%86%e6%a1%8c%e4%bc%9a%e8%ae%ae%e4%b8%8a%e6%bc%94%e8%ae%b2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usachinalaw.com/ch_blog/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[中国北京 罗博德.艾伦将于2008年11月15日至16日在北京举办的第二届中外跨国CEO圆桌会议上演讲。艾伦先生演讲的主题是“中西方的企业社会责任”。 该圆桌会议由中国跨国公司研究会和七个联合国组织主办，包括联合国可持续发展委员会，联合国开发计划署， 联合国贸易和发展会议， 联合国工业发展组织， 联合国环境规划署， 联合国全球契约组织， 和联合国南方中心。 参会的人员将有世界500强20位总裁/副总裁， 中国500强100位总裁/副总裁，来自不同国家的特使，工业发展区的董事，银行行长，证券交易所主席，基金会主席， 以及11位在华外国商会领导人。 15位中国的部长或副部长，中国和外国的市长或副市长，海峡两岸关系协会和海峡交流基金会的代表， 和联合国的官员也将出席这次圆桌会议。 大会开幕式后， 大会将举行以下论坛：工商领袖圆桌会议， 能源危机与环境恶化论坛，通货膨胀和金融危机论坛， 企业社会责任论坛， 保护主义和平等发展论坛， 以及和谐发展论坛。]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>中国北京</p>
<p>罗博德.艾伦将于2008年11月15日至16日在北京举办的第二届中外跨国CEO圆桌会议上演讲。艾伦先生演讲的主题是“中西方的企业社会责任”。</p>
<p>该圆桌会议由中国跨国公司研究会和七个联合国组织主办，包括联合国可持续发展委员会，联合国开发计划署， 联合国贸易和发展会议， 联合国工业发展组织， 联合国环境规划署， 联合国全球契约组织， 和联合国南方中心。</p>
<p>参会的人员将有世界500强20位总裁/副总裁， 中国500强100位总裁/副总裁，来自不同国家的特使，工业发展区的董事，银行行长，证券交易所主席，基金会主席， 以及11位在华外国商会领导人。</p>
<p>15位中国的部长或副部长，中国和外国的市长或副市长，海峡两岸关系协会和海峡交流基金会的代表， 和联合国的官员也将出席这次圆桌会议。</p>
<p>大会开幕式后， 大会将举行以下论坛：工商领袖圆桌会议， 能源危机与环境恶化论坛，通货膨胀和金融危机论坛， 企业社会责任论坛， 保护主义和平等发展论坛， 以及和谐发展论坛。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.usachinalaw.com/ch_blog/%e7%bd%97%e5%8d%9a%e5%be%b7%e8%89%be%e4%bc%a6%e5%9c%a8%e7%ac%ac%e4%ba%8c%e5%b1%8a%e4%b8%ad%e5%a4%96%e8%b7%a8%e5%9b%bdceo%e5%9c%86%e6%a1%8c%e4%bc%9a%e8%ae%ae%e4%b8%8a%e6%bc%94%e8%ae%b2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
